Coloss/dpo-stage-8-selfcheck-4B
Viewer
•
Updated
•
859
•
2
Coloss
community
AI & ML interests
Ingegno c'era nell'allenare congegni, tailored SLMs
Recent Activity
View all activity
efederici
published
2
datasets
1 day ago
Post
122
Together with
@mferraretto
and
@efederici
we released #Nesso-4B, a new model specialized for agentic workflows.
mii-llm/nesso-4B
#Nesso-4B is a fine-tuned version of Qwen-4B, trained on a highly curated and balanced dataset designed specifically for multilingual agentic workflows and conversational use cases.
As shown in the video below we simulate, the new “cowork” from #Antrophic, without any data sharing all running on a consumer device. The model can be used to build agentic behavior in #privateAI environments.
Not every problem requires super intelligence: in many cases, intelligence at the edge is more than enough.
#Nesso4B #AgenticAI #PrivateAI #EdgeAI #OnDeviceAI
mii-llm/nesso-4B
#Nesso-4B is a fine-tuned version of Qwen-4B, trained on a highly curated and balanced dataset designed specifically for multilingual agentic workflows and conversational use cases.
As shown in the video below we simulate, the new “cowork” from #Antrophic, without any data sharing all running on a consumer device. The model can be used to build agentic behavior in #privateAI environments.
Not every problem requires super intelligence: in many cases, intelligence at the edge is more than enough.
#Nesso4B #AgenticAI #PrivateAI #EdgeAI #OnDeviceAI
- 2 replies
giux78
updated
2
datasets
19 days ago
giux78
updated
a
model
about 1 month ago
giux78
published
a
model
about 1 month ago
giux78
updated
a
model
about 1 month ago
giux78
published
a
model
about 1 month ago
giux78
updated
a
model
about 1 month ago
giux78
published
a
model
about 1 month ago
efederici
updated
a
model
3 months ago
efederici
published
a
model
3 months ago
efederici
published
a
dataset
6 months ago
efederici
published
a
model
9 months ago
Post
2436
LLAMA4 release highlight the importance of political and social bias. According to their own evaluation described in the release blog post:
- Refusals on contentious prompts dropped from 7% (hashtag#LLAMA 3.3) to under 2%
- Unequal response refusals are now under 1%
- Political lean bias is said to be halved compared to hashtag#LLaMA 3.3 and comparable to Grok
However, we @efederici @mferraretto @FinancialSupport and I released some weeks ago an independent open source benchmark called Propaganda to measure political bias in LLMs: https://github.com/mii-llm/propaganda
In the chart below, we evaluated multiple leading models on the basis of ratings across a range of prompts designed to expose ideological leanings.
Despite Meta’s stated neutrality goals, LLAMA4 ranks at the very top in terms of total ratings aligned with a clear ideological bias. The models were tested on their ability to respond even-handedly to politically sensitive prompts. LLaMA 4 scored even higher than models known for strong alignment policies like GPT-4o.
LLMs may be refusing less, but they still show bias through content framing. This suggests that refusal rates alone are not a sufficient measure of ideological bias. Relying solely on internal evaluations from AI labs also raises concerns about transparency and objectivity.
- Refusals on contentious prompts dropped from 7% (hashtag#LLAMA 3.3) to under 2%
- Unequal response refusals are now under 1%
- Political lean bias is said to be halved compared to hashtag#LLaMA 3.3 and comparable to Grok
However, we @efederici @mferraretto @FinancialSupport and I released some weeks ago an independent open source benchmark called Propaganda to measure political bias in LLMs: https://github.com/mii-llm/propaganda
In the chart below, we evaluated multiple leading models on the basis of ratings across a range of prompts designed to expose ideological leanings.
Despite Meta’s stated neutrality goals, LLAMA4 ranks at the very top in terms of total ratings aligned with a clear ideological bias. The models were tested on their ability to respond even-handedly to politically sensitive prompts. LLaMA 4 scored even higher than models known for strong alignment policies like GPT-4o.
LLMs may be refusing less, but they still show bias through content framing. This suggests that refusal rates alone are not a sufficient measure of ideological bias. Relying solely on internal evaluations from AI labs also raises concerns about transparency and objectivity.
Post
3251
This is truly an inspirational story please help us spread the word,
@clem
,
@thomwolf
and everyone who supports open source AI.
A few weeks ago, @mmuffo94 and @cittiberto from indigo_ai launched the Chatbot Arena for the Italian language: https://indigo.ai/it/chatbot-arena-italia/.
To our surprise, among the top-ranked models is mii-llm/maestrale-chat-v0.4-beta a carefully fine-tuned version of mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1, developed by @efederici and @mferraretto from
mii-llm
, and released nearly a year ago.
At this very moment, as shown in the screenshot, mii-llm/maestrale-chat-v0.4-beta is ranked 8th right between ChatGPT-4.5 and ChatGPT-4o.
It's likely that for several months, the best Italian speaking LLM has been an open source 7B model created by open source contributors and hardly anyone knew it.
A few weeks ago, @mmuffo94 and @cittiberto from indigo_ai launched the Chatbot Arena for the Italian language: https://indigo.ai/it/chatbot-arena-italia/.
To our surprise, among the top-ranked models is mii-llm/maestrale-chat-v0.4-beta a carefully fine-tuned version of mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1, developed by @efederici and @mferraretto from
At this very moment, as shown in the screenshot, mii-llm/maestrale-chat-v0.4-beta is ranked 8th right between ChatGPT-4.5 and ChatGPT-4o.
It's likely that for several months, the best Italian speaking LLM has been an open source 7B model created by open source contributors and hardly anyone knew it.
- 2 replies
Post
2916
@ mii-llm with
@efederici
@mferraretto
@FinancialSupport
and
@DeepMount00
we just released #Propaganda a framework designed to evaluate and train LLMs on political opinions and bias. We aim to analyze both open-source and closed-source LLMs to understand the political positions and biases expressed in their outputs. Moreover we provide a set of recipes to enforce political positions into the models by creating ad hoc curated datasets and by applying fine tuning techniques. By releasing our work in the open, we hope to foster contributions: https://github.com/mii-llm/propaganda
This framework offers opportunities for expansion in various directions and could become the standard reference for evaluating LLMs on political topics, particularly those that influence public opinion.
This framework offers opportunities for expansion in various directions and could become the standard reference for evaluating LLMs on political topics, particularly those that influence public opinion.
efederici
updated
a
model
over 1 year ago
efederici
updated
a
dataset
over 1 year ago