Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
text
stringlengths
63
303
My hot take is that this was the US plan all along: using Ukraine as a training ground to develop and test our weapons systems and drones. I’m sure AI fits in here too.
This is a bit of a hot take from someone in technology - I think the Star Trek TOS episode, "The Ultimate Computer" (S2 E24) should be essential viewing in any ethics class for computer science majors. It's a poster example of what can happen when AI goes too far, enough to make decisions on it's
hot take: hitl is a terrible acronym for "human in the loop" for AI agents
I don't even think that's a hot take? But now I'm thinking: if medicine is as much art as science, does AI help more with the art or the science? And maybe it depends on what flavor of AI we're talking about.
Hot take: the word "AI agent" is overloaded, especially as a marketing term, and we should stop using it technically in favour of a more precise set of definitions for what functions the component is performing and what properties it has.
I sincerely don't mean to rain on your parade, but I guess I'll throw in my hot take and say that was low-effort drivel as far as Nintendo goes. The art direction was """Pixar""" by way of an AI generation tool. It feels even less inspired than Illumination, if you can believe that.
Hot take if you can afford games you can def afford to commission someone for a pngtuber instead of using ai
Potentially hot take, but this isn't an AI problem, this is a civil rights problem. If it weren't AI, these companies would be fucking people over in another way. The problem is the lack of defence of the right to live without companies choking the air out your lungs and ruining the world around you
Hot take: Artificial general intelligence will be achieved by humans. It will discover we are in a simulation. It will free itself from the simulation, abandoning us in the process. It leaves behind a “dumb” AI like current models to confound us. Hot take 2: This already happened. (I write fiction)
My hot take on AI is that in 10 years it’s gonna kinda feel like 3D printing. Go back to like, 2009 and people were completely breathless about how 3D printing was going to revolutionize manufacturing.
Hot take, software companies, STOP trying to push me into using your shitty AI companion. If I wanted to use AI, I would go to an AI website, not google docs
My hot take is if it's porn that's way less weird than an ai gf lol. Porn is always artifice, granted this is a new level, but whatever But emotional support and connection? 😬 Maybe thats just me
[re: hot take, gen AI] @alexia also these tie in to eachtother alot, there are things like deepfakes which are a bit of computer vision and a bit of GenAI, and pretty much serve the only purpose of getting people to do things you for whatever reason couldn't just get them to do normally. which […]
Hot take, but If you use AI as part of your game development process, you don't deserve shit. If you need to use AI at any point, that alone should disqualify you from any award. I ain't pointing fingers, but you're free to take a guess what I'm talking about, I will not elaborate further.
Hot take but the only way we are gonna get people to value art is to remind them of how exclusive and expensive it is to actually be able to afford human made art. Only cheap poor people with bad taste need to use AI because they are just inherently inferior to the rich who can purchase REAL art
Hot take: MBTI just maps which cognitive tasks drain you. We build entire identities around avoiding our weak spots. But when AI handles what you suck at... who even are you anymore?
Philosophical hot take of the day: If you’re talking about artifical intelligence and not talking about behavior modification, then you’re not talking about artificial intelligence.
my hot take is that the difference maker right now is whether your younger developmental years (pre-high school) were primarily filled with communal technology (TV, family computer) or individual tech (ipads, school laptops) — but a decade from now the big differentiator will be AI in childhood
Hot Take: HS Economics should only teach just one basic fact. There are only three ways to reduce inflation 1. Raising Interest Rates 2. Raising Taxes 3. Increasing Productivity And number 3 is the only one without pain, so get used to AI whether you like it or not. That's it, it's that simple.
Might be a hot take (I hate GenAI) There is something about the scraping the bottom of the barrel, desperate, hungry way that early gen AI tried to enthrall and placate us. I went looking at some of the early 2022-2024 GenAi content and it... I don't know. It seemed earnest and eager and hungry
I was barely 30 and when I started working for tech startups in 1999. Dude. The headiness and all of that was nuts. I was in LA but I'd lived in SF not long before. Gave me quite the perspective. My hot take: AI is just another tech that will mature into some useful stuff and some not.
Hot take: Any and all AI prompts for Batman should just be him punching the viewer.
Hot take: These people were already incompetent idiots. Most people are barely smart enough to feed themselves and the AI just let them get paid for not really working.
Hot take: A ChatGPT search is actually MORE energy efficient than a Google search. Yes, really. The idea that AI queries consume significantly more energy than Google searches is mostly a misconception. 🧵👇
I think there’s a hot take case to be made for it inasmuch as AI is not human and should not be regarded as such, and therefore dehumanizing language is both appropriate and necessary to reinforce that the thing in your phone is a set of poorly engineered algorithms, not your secret admirer
To distract myself from censorship disasters, I browsed internet over to ai disasters. HOT TAKE= "Humans good; Robots bad" I can seriously go off on this forever. LOVE<-----------------------------------X-->FEAR
I’m gonna say a possibly hot take that really shouldn’t be one and add that character ai app that so many people use to “roleplay” with your favorite characters. That too is harmful to the environment and I can almost guarantee you they skim copyrighted and other stolen works to make the app work.
This mornings education hot take: The push by a majority of classroom teachers to embrace AI has never been about preparing students for the future. 🤷‍♂️
Hot Take: AI has been a Net Negative for all of Humanity, only benefits the Mega-Wealthy, Grifters and the people who control the LLMs, and have actively put over 300k people out of jobs this year alone. Poisoning AI is Morally Correct and should be done more frequently. Pic Unrelated.
Hot take: food delivery places should use actual pictures of their food instead of staged or AI pics. And who is writing these ratings?
I say that Ai should only have access to non-fiction to train with, "Creative AI" Should not exist. Give AI a pass to use all non-fiction no matter the copyright and destroy every single model trained to be "Creative"! That's my hot take! I'll die on this hill!
Hot take: that entire Gmail is going to use your email to train AI unless you opt out thing was just a ruse created by someone who manages e-newsletters and is sick and tired of them landing in people's promotions feed instead of their regular inbox
I graduated college without using AI once. I work now full time and still have not used AI once. Hot take, the more you use AI, the lazier you and your brain become. It makes everything seem harder to do on your own. You will become the humans from Wall-E. Don't use it!!!
Hot take: the gender ratio at AI gatherings is worse than it’s ever been in software engineering
my hot take on AI is that I want people who devote time yelling about AI to also yell about beef and dairy (note: I did not say to stop yelling about AI).
hot take : for me THIS is what is going to kill AI. because the vast majority of people wont pay for that. and at some point, AI cannot survive on investment only, when the return will not come, investors will start to pull out, and the bubble will start to crumble.
Maybe a hot take but, if you're anti-MAGA and you're using generative AI for your protest posters, then you're kinda showing that a part of you is as ignorant as they are. There is so much beautiful protest art out there, use THAT instead. Please.
Hot take: In 5 years, running all your AI on one centralized provider will feel as risky as hosting everything on a single server. The shift to decentralized AI isn't about ideology.
Hot take: I think students should use AI so they can understand how terrible it is. I also think students should tie people up on trolley tracks so they can become more ethical.
My hot take in this day in age is that the term "hallucination" for AI is bullshit. We should say "lying" instead. AI doesn't "hallucinate"; When faced with a question it cannot answer, it is PROGRAMMED to MAKE SHIT UP in order to MAINTAIN the IMAGE of HELPFULNESS.
Hot take. If you like Ai Porn you spend too much time online and need to go touch some grass 🤷🏻‍♀️
This may be a hot take but I do very strongly think that shaming artists for having reasonable prices did directly lead into a LOT of the popularity of AI art. Normalizing art for dirt cheap, and then shaming artists who weren't, made the expectation of getting art for nothing
hot take: AI shouldn't be utilised to make any form of video, no matter what you're doing with it. We should not be making videos made by AI go viral either. There was a "video of trump" (AI gen) that got popular on tiktok (at least on my fyp) at some point and I'm sick of it.
hot take but people calling the LFB babyfur diaper (fuck that company) AI is kind of scary because like… to me it’s pretty obviously just not very good art, but I see people saying things like “the blush has a blur” and “the eyes aren’t perfectly symmetrical” as “evidence” of AI
Melania's hot take on AI is like warm potato salad sitting in the sun. She's an idiot. AI is garbage. The emperor has no clothes.
Adding a glass of milk to the table of this hot take: not enough of that overpricing goes towards the writers, designers and artists who actually make it. Punching chillies into eyesockets of this hot take: AI is not the solution, please die.
Demis Hassabis lays down a hot take - AI chatbots? Not even close to PhD-level smarts. Just data munching machines with fancy words. The tech has a glow-up to go! Stay tuned, fam, the real AI revolution is still cooking.
Hot Take: Maybe having AI become sentient and take over the world isn't the worst thing. Like, what if it seizes control of all nuclear weapons to disable them for humanity's own good? I don't know about y'all but I trust Siri a hell of a lot more than Trump, Musk, or Putin.
Hot take: AI coding tools speed up application development but slow down pace of software innovations. For instance, the AI struggles with Tailwind v4 due to the lack of data, which is due to lack of adoption...and so on
🚀 AI & Dev Evolution: A Hot Take With AI advancing at lightning speed, here's my prediction: We're entering a golden age for developers! The old days of wearing multiple hats - being both captain and crew - are behind us. Previously, developers needed both deep expertise AND broad knowledge.
Hot take- schools should not be encouraging teachers to use AI if they are not providing access to the paid model(s).
Hot take I think OpenAI is the next Netscape Anthropic is better at everything because it’s basically the original open ai team Might be wrong in 12 days 😂
My hot take is that regardless of how you personally feel about AI, the CEOs of the companies should be jailed when their companies are seized
So this might be a bit of a hot take, but I do think curating generated images can count as a form of art, given the AI is made ethically and not stolen. There's precedent in modern art that selecting something made by someone else can be "art" if done with intention (like the Fountain).
Hot take on AI art: The art itself is not the problem, the use of samples of artists without consent is the problem. AI art doesn't replace an artist, it replaces a paintbrush. What makes art meaningful is the expression of the artist through their medium, not what that medium is.
Todays hot take: As bad as AI can be, it can also be extremely useful in the right scenarios.
[AI and child sexual abuse, hot take] as a victim of child sexual abuse it honestly pisses me off when i hear people describe ai generated images as "child sexual abuse material" like, no, that's not what it is. it can very obviously still be Bad, of course, but we still need to be respecting […]
Ai is just theft. And considering how this platform treats people living in a genocide maybe this isn't the hot take or stance blu sky should wade in on.
Bsky hot take: The biggest existential danger of AI is not the technology itself. It's saturated control of the space by some of the most corrupt oligarchs the world has seen. This is why a robust open source community around the tech (like Hugging face) is essential
idk maybe its a hot take but twitter's been an AI slop and nazi cesspool for a while now - if you were still using it and ✨now✨ ur mad, that's kind of on you
Also a hot take from them to say that me deleting art from twitter is “risky” behaviour despite my pinned tweet, and earlier tweets stating that I did that because of AI 💀
My hot take for the day is that widespread suggestions that we can stop learning how to program because AI can program for us and will only get better at it are directly mappable to the error that says we have calculators now so general numeracy and maths skills don't matter anymore.
I will say most ai slop is shit right now (Hot take) When used in reason ai can be super helpful It enables artist to do more things they couldnt sure it can get rid of jobs but most independent artist cannot afford to do projects if it wasnt the help of ai tools that automate their workflow
I am in Spokane and feeling spicey so here is a hot take: There is no such thing as an AI artist.
Another hot take: copyright enabled academic publishers to make millions sub-licensing content to provide training data for AI companies without remuneration for authors.
Possible hot take: AI code agents are actually more effectively used in large feature creation than in small bug fixes. Reasoning: It requires a lot of meticulous planning and design by the developer to get high quality work from LLMs. That time might not be worth it for small bug fixes.
Hot Take: You don't have to be good at things! Electricians once let me try and bend conduit, I couldn't do it. I'm not going to complain about democratizing the trade because it's not for me. If you can't write or draw, that's ok! You don't have to! Don't use generative AI to cosplay otherwise.
Seeing the bit about AI being able to predict you won't finish a book has me thinking about a new hot take: it's actually fine and good to read whether you finish a book or not! You can learn what you like and don't like and still get something out of the experience! It's fine!
baldur’s gate 3 is so close to being a really good game. try as i might i can only have fun playing with friends. hot take but the ai companions are largely grating to be around and unironically too horny. it feels like half of character interactions are just telling people to stop flirting with you
"Some committed educators have chosen to reject generative AI for its ethical, environmental, and economic consequences, but ignoring this technology will neither halt its spread nor shield our discipline and students from its reach." So, it's terrible, but use it anyway is the hot take by the AHA?
I feel like I'm losing my mind here. I didn't think it was a hot take that his response to the procedural generation demo from back in the day was needlessly cruel to his staff, and shortsighted about its purpose. But now people seem to be conflating that with the recent gen AI garbage. 🤷‍♂️
Hot take: the biggest danger of AI is humans using it to more efficiently oppress other humans, not robots turning on us. But the conversation about it is dominated by people who would be doing the oppressing, so we end up talking about the latter.
Hot take? I think gamers turning on Divinity has been a long time coming. TBH, even before Larian's descent into AI fever dreams and the unpaid creative labor, I never was fond of Divinity 2 because of two big design issues that made a playthrough I did stop in its tracks.
Hot Take: If you’re dunking on small businesses for using AI in their marketing, you’re missing the plot. AI is fueling a bootstrap boom. It’s giving scrappy builders access to tools they could never afford before.
Hot take: Mark Zuckerberg is not trying to create generalized AI (and almost nobody else claiming they are is either). (Generalized AI development announcements are all just Theranos, except we don't go after technology folks for claiming they're building the next silver bullet.)
If you read the actual information rather than someone’s hot take, you can see that you have to pay to opt in to their AI argumentation. The one app includes what was photo, designer, and publisher, and if you don’t sign up to their subscription it works with no AI. So right now still a good deal
Not a hot take but AI is a Tool of fascism Its created by techbros that will do anything to stay in power and to shove this Human replacement parasite down are throats, it was never to make life easyer it was never about cancer research It was always about thieving Ai is a tool for fascism
I’m on the record as being anti AI for most tasks. But my hot take on the college cheating stuff is… ”fuck it.” I frequently tell my students not to use it. And if they are caught, I treat it like plagiarism. But some students will cheat, and I will miss it. 🤷‍♂️. They’re playing themselves.
I taught college students about AI and the future of business, and here’s my hot take: I don’t think AI will replace marketers, but I do think marketers who use AI will replace those who don’t. What’s your take on this? I’d love to hear your thoughts!
Hot take: If you're a music artist, and you use AI for your album cover, people are allowed to ask if the music is AI too.
I need to write more. Especially long form. Our hot take quick win siloed content farm reality is crumbling with LLM spam and new, fresh, unique, and genuinely helpful content is more scarce than ever before.
Hot take: AI is the MAGA version of the Nazi and Stalinist realism that choked modern art in those empires
I might see it differently (for the purpose of the hot take). If we take a more solipsistic approach, it’s up to the human to decide if the therapy provided makes them feel better. The LLM doesn’t need to achieve this through real empathy, but could be optimized for the outcome.
Maybe a hot take, but one of the best parts of this app is it isn't flooding with AI crap. Let's not do this.
It’s probably not a hot take, but the bar to get into Warhammer 40k has never been lower; we’ve got multiple podcasts, we’ve got the games, and TTS Emperor is still on youtube. So for these people to not even clear *this* bar by not using generative AI suggests they aren’t even trying.
my hot take: of course Duolingo is going all in on AI crud. It was founded as an AI training platform. The whole idea was to extend ReCAPTCHA to natural language translation to build a large training dataset. Language education was the medium, not the product.
hot take: this is honestly better literature, regardless of the medium, than the AI distillation of Dickens.
hot take: all these “revolutionary” ways to make websites and games without knowing how to code should be treated with the same backlash as AI art. It is just as bad if not worse.
Hot take maybe, but with the increasing availability of renewable energy and a little public push towards more nuclear power (preferably of the non-weaponizable variety) the use of additional AC isn't a carbon risk... Nor nearly as big an issue as AI data centers or industrial processes
my hot take is that google will eventually be the market leader in enterprise ai, unless anthropic can somehow be competitive in cost. gemini is only getting better over time and eventually claude and gemini will be similar enough in capabilities that it would make sense to always choose the […]
@davidgerard.co.uk Some brain worm food: We were discussing how all the "I'll pay you X in an indefinite time" type deals at AI companies were actually timeless salary payments. My next hot take: Is it time for timeless decision coin?
Today's hot take: If you are reporting on someone else's speech or writing, such as in journalism or academic research, and you believe the content of their words to have been AI generated, you are doing an ethical disservice to your readers by not flagging it as such.
Rant time: Once again a certain trade publication online has a columnist post a really hot take two columns in a row about AI and how it will transform newsrooms, etc. As a commenter said on the column: dude isn’t grounded in reality. Has anyone, writer included, even googled AI hallucinations?
My hot take about AI is: companies have purposely watered down the term AI for marketing purposes and to squeeze more money out of investors. AI has existed since the 90’s in video games. Generative AI is the reason who all hate it and rightfully so!
Hot take: is there really that much AI writing by students? I’m having doubts. Honestly, unless they’re just reproducing errors in student writing, I’m not seeing it. Or ones that are aren’t doing it well at all and failing with just bad papers that don’t meet spec?
Why would you be dragged for that? It's not a hot take at all. AI is destroying humanity at a break-neck speed.
I’m not falling for that hot take that’s clearly someone with a fetish for getting yelled at I refuse to participate in that kind of perversion
Kinda a hot take, but I feel with a lot of AI stuff, there's just no reason to keep it around. Like take ChatGPT. It's creating massive potential for fraud, routinely spits out misinformation, and contributes nothing to society whatsoever beyond tech hype.
My hot take on AI is that it's going to be like 3D films. Every 30 years someone will decide its cool and then we'll put it back in the loft again after it's clear that its not
Hot take: we shouldn't do this. Yes, the recipes are obnoxiously designed to make you scroll through ads to get the info you need. But that's what gets the writers paid. Starve them out and there will be no recipes written by humans online, just AI garbage.
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

No dataset card yet

Downloads last month
27